Notes from the work
What we run into building configurators and quoting systems for people who make things written up while it is still fresh.
Latest
Your configurator is "suitable for" monitoring. In Dutch law, that is the whole question.
Dutch law turns on whether a system is suitable for monitoring, not on whether you intend to. Why article 27 WOR catches configurators that monitor nobody.
More from the blog
Belgium: which language does your software speak to your workforce in?
Flanders, Wallonia, Brussels: which language the law requires for workforce software, what CBA 39 demands, and what happens if you get it wrong.
A yield increase of a few percent. On every job. Forever
A few percent of material yield on every order adds up in the annual accounts. Why nesting is a computational problem, not a question of experience.
We do not have an adequacy decision. Here is what that means.
India has no EU adequacy decision. What that actually means for data location, standard contractual clauses and your vendor assessment - stated plainly.
Why configurator projects don't get finished
Projects rarely fail technically. They stall because the modelling work lands on someone who already has a full-time job. What changes that.
Why your configurator triggers co-determination, even though it monitors nobody
German co-determination is assessed objectively, not by intent. Why configurators, MES and planning systems are caught - and how to clear it in eight weeks.